Biotechnology: Decisions of the GA and CSD
United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development, 3rd Session
New York, 11-28 April 1995
Report of the Commission on Sustainable Development on the Third
Session (11-28 April 1995)
- Environmentally sound management of biotechnology
153. The Commission on Sustainable Development takes note of the
report of the Secretary-General on the subject of chapter 16 of Agenda
21, entitled "Environmentally sound management of
biotechnology" (E/CN.17/1995/20) and its Proposals for action
provided in section V of that report which identify areas for priority
action by countries and international organizations, with a view to
enhancing the potential contribution of biotechnology in the attainment
of sustainable development objectives at national, regional and
international levels within a framework of biosafety. Future reports
should place a stronger emphasis, including more information and
proposals, on the ecological, safety, health, and socio-economic and
ethical aspects of the application of biotechnology and the
commercialization of biotechnology products, with particular reference
to genetic engineering, including genetically modified organisms when
human genetic material is involved. Such reports should take into
account existing uncertainties and the most recent findings of the
science of genetics. This would enable the Commission to take a balanced
and objective approach to biotechnology.
154. The Commission recalls that chapter 16 of Agenda 21 states that
the environmentally sound management of biotechnology has the potential
to make a significant contribution to enabling the development of better
health care, enhanced food security through sustainable agriculture
practices, improved supplies of potable water, more efficient industrial
development processes for transforming raw materials, support for
sustainable methods of afforestation and reforestation, the removal of
pollutants from the environment, and the conservation and use of natural
resources, notably biological resources. The Commission urges United
Nations bodies to continue to monitor and evaluate biotechnology
experiments and projects.
155. The Commission recognizes, however, that concerns exist about
biosafety in the application of biotechnology and the commercialization
of biotechnology products, in particular with regard to genetically
modified organisms. It notes the absence of a globally agreed framework
for the safe handling and transfer of biotechnology, and the sustainable
management of genetically modified organisms. It further notes the
particular significance of this for developing countries. Taking into
account the precautionary approach, the Commission attaches high
priority to the safe handling of biotechnology. It therefore welcomes
the decision of the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties to
the Convention on Biological Diversity to establish a process for
considering the need for and modalities of a protocol on biosafety in
the field of the safe transfer, handling and use of any living modified
organisms resulting from biotechnology that may have adverse effect on
the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. That
decision involves the establishment of a panel of experts and an
open-ended ad hoc working group of experts nominated by Governments. It
also welcomes the decision of the Conference of the Parties to include
consideration of the knowledge, innovations and practices of indigenous
and local communities in its medium-term programme of work.
156. The Commission also notes recent initiatives for the
implementation of the objectives of chapter 16, such as the WHO
Conference on Biotechnology and World Health, the recent launch of the
Biosafety Information Network and Advisory Service (BINAS) within the
United Nations system under the auspices of UNIDO, and the ongoing work
in UNEP, as well as the work taking place within the European Union and
OECD and the rapid streamlining and rationalization of the regulation of
biotechnology products in the United States.
157. The Commission, therefore:
(a) Urges Governments to take specific action, within the framework
of articles 16 and 19 of the Convention on Biological Diversity, aimed
at enhancing the potential contribution of the private sector,
financial, academic and research institutions, non-governmental
organizations and other major groups, to the implementation of the
objectives of chapter 16, particularly in view of their significant role
in research and the development, application, and financing of
biotechnology, and in capacity- building for biosafety, risk management
and assessments, and to:
(i)Increase where appropriate the involvement of business and
industry, and financial, academic and research institutions,
non-governmental organizations and other major groups in national,
regional and international consultations on biotechnology
development trends and on impact assessments;
(ii) Encourage the conducting of case-studies on "best
practice" in the environmentally sound and safe development,
application and management of biotechnology, and to make the results
available, especially to developing countries at national and
regional levels;
(iii) Support as appropriate the establishment of biotechnology
associations, particularly in developing countries, with a view to
facilitating the safe commercialization and application of
biotechnology products and processes, in accordance with the
provisions of articles 16 and 19 of the Convention on Biological
Diversity;
(iv) Also support as appropriate the establishment and
strengthening of research facilities in universities, research
institutes and Governments in connection with scientific aspects of
biosafety and risk management and assessments;
(v) Mobilize financial resources from both the public and the
private sector for biotechnology research, development and work on
safety and for its sustainable use and management, especially in
developing countries;
(b) Urges countries and international organizations to accord high
priority to measures aimed at integrating biotechnology, including
biosafety concerns, effectively into national and regional sustainable
development policies and programmes. In this regard, support should be
provided to:
(i) Enhance the contribution of business and industry, local
authorities, scientific and technological communities,
non-governmental organizations and other major groups to the
identification of problems (and appropriate solutions) related to
the environmentally sound use and management of biotechnology;
(ii) Promote a balanced and accurate understanding of
biotechnology issues as they impinge upon sustainable development
including those related to biosafety and progressive trends in
biotechnology development, through, for example, training at
national and regional levels;
(iii) Establish national databases on information related to
biosafety where these do not currently exist and promote the
exchange of information concerning biosafety in biotechnology;
(iv) Encourage the national and local scientific and
technological communities to exercise ethical responsibility,
through safe laboratory practices and effective and transparent
interaction with the public at large;
(v) Assess the need for advice and assistance in promoting the
development or re-enforcement of biotechnology and biosafety
regulations, norms and standards, especially in the fields of
agricultural, human and animal health, with a view to designing
effective programmes for the environmentally sound management of
biotechnology, building whenever possible upon existing activities
and capacities;
(vi) Enhance efforts aimed at human resource development,
transfer and development of technology and capacity-building in
developing countries to regulate, manage and control risks
associated with the use and release of living modified organisms
resulting from biotechnology;
(c) Invites the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on
Biological Diversity to keep the Commission informed of developments
concerning the work on the need for and modalities of a protocol on
biosafety, with a view to identifying areas for further cooperation on
this issue. Such areas might include work on capacity-building measures,
especially in developing countries;
(d) Invites countries, international organizations and the Conference
of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity to make their
experiences gained in the environmentally sound application and
management of biotechnology available in order to facilitate the
Commission's work in keeping this issue under review;
(e) Notes the work on the development of possible international
voluntary technical guidelines on biosafety and stresses that such work
should not be seen as overriding existing national and regional
legislation or as prejudging the result of the ongoing discussions on
the need for and modalities of a protocol on biosafety under the
Convention on Biological Diversity.
|